Let's Design and Build a (mostly) Digital Theremin!

Posted: 1/23/2025 2:05:32 PM
dewster

From: Northern NJ, USA

Joined: 2/17/2012

"PETG Paintable - no problem, although the paint solvents don't really melt into the PETG, nor is is necessary because of the excellent tooth adhesion where the paint permeates the porosity."  - pitts8r

I'm finding other possible uses for the 3D printed surface texture too.  The pattern formed by the Z layering is quite regular, and so can form the basis of a rather aggressive friction fit between parts with identical Z stepping.  And the same pattern can act as a guide for coil windings, particularly those consisting of finer wire.

Posted: 1/26/2025 3:30:23 PM
dewster

From: Northern NJ, USA

Joined: 2/17/2012

It's a Question of Aspect Ratios

I made three single layer air core solenoids, all wound with 1 build insulation 30AWG on PETG 3D printed coil forms, with three different winding aspect ratios (winding length / diameter) of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.88:

The 1.88 aspect ratio coil is the standard kit pitch coil.  For the two larger diameter coils I printed some end caps, which really help to stiffen the otherwise too flexible 4 layer walls.  For larger coils one could also print extra internal stiffeners and perhaps glue them in.  The tallest coil is covered in heatshrink, the other two were instead coated in clear nail polish to secure the windings.

I tested the coils in my test jig, which lowers the drive impedance of the signal generator to approx. 2.4 Ohms, and presents approx. 13.4pF load to the other end of the coil.  Q is directly read as the output / input voltage ratio:

Observations:
- DCR increases with aspect ratio due to the reduction in bulk coupling, which requires more wire to reach the target inductance.
- The self resonance frequency is a measure of the self capacitance of the coil (and its environment).  Lower aspect ratios place the ends of the coil closer together, which increases the self capacitance.
- The 1:1 aspect ratio coil has slightly higher Q than the other coils, but a bit lower self resonance that the 1:1.88 coil.  So 1:1 (or thereabouts) has optimal bulk coupling for resonance with the jig capacitance, but at the expense of an increase in self capacitance.
- Any of these coils would function well in a digital Theremin because the influences of the aspect ratio are broad minima / maxima; ideally one would pick 1:1 or somewhat higher.
- Q is more important than self resonance because it directly increases both the antenna voltage swing and the frequency selectivity. 
- Increased antenna voltage improves external noise rejection.
- Increased frequency selectivity improves both oscillator stability and external noise rejection.

Posted: 1/26/2025 7:14:41 PM
JPascal

From: Berlin Germany

Joined: 4/27/2016

- Q is more important than self resonance because it directly increases both the antenna voltage swing and the frequency selectivity.  - Increased antenna voltage improves external noise rejection.- Increased frequency selectivity improves both oscillator stability and external noise rejection.

Home systems generate broadband signals that are picked up more strongly with a high Q, or so I thought?

Posted: 1/27/2025 12:36:25 PM
dewster

From: Northern NJ, USA

Joined: 2/17/2012

"Home systems generate broadband signals that are picked up more strongly with a high Q, or so I thought?"  - JPascal

Q is like a flywheel, with high Q you have to time the interference almost exactly in order to significantly perturb it.  So if the interference has sufficient amplitude and hits the high Q resonance more or less spot-on then yes, it can cause big trouble.  But low Q has a broader resonance, which gives interference a wider "window" to get in.  So we're relying on the interference to be statistically unlikely to hit our high Q system.  Some form of spread spectrum would likely be better in terms of countermeasures here, but that usually means lower Q coils, and thus lower antenna voltages.

I've experimented a bit here: two D-Levs can interfere with each other over several meters, but you have to work at aligning the field frequencies pretty closely (similar antennas and rather slow sweep with the pitch hand) before you notice it.  Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence, but I haven't had any reports of other Theremins interfering with the D-Lev.  As far as I know (measuring when I have the opportunity, perusing schematics, etc.) the D-Lev has higher voltage fields than most other Theremins.

You must be logged in to post a reply. Please log in or register for a new account.