>>"Fred I need your opinion of this webpage. You will think I am making this up?"
Christopher, I certainly dont think you are "making this up" -
But I am at a loss to explain it in any way - and I do not understand some of the things you are saying:
>>"On the oscilloscope I see a 30 kHz carrier frequency taken from the normal theremin audio output jack" "The 30 kHz frequency passes right through the detector detector as if it did not exist."
Here is where my misunderstanding starts - unless you are a dog, I do not see 30kHz as "audio" (LOL) - and I wonder if "The 30 kHz frequency passes right through the detector detector as if it did not exist." is actually caused by this 30kHz being remoned by the filter which usually follows the detector.. If it was some 'noob' posting this, I would assume that this was the case, but as it is you, I think I must be misunderstanding something.
So, my first question is: What frequencies are the oscillators running at, and therefore what is the actual difference frequency you SHOULD be seeing from the detector?
>>"The heterodyne method I am using is so responsive that you actually pass through several Null points reaching toward the aerial. There is one dominant range or field of notes, that is what I tune too. The pitch field still behaves mostly as would be expected."
This "pass through several Null points" leads me to believe that you are seeing the effects of harmonics from the two oscillators interacting with each other - that, perhaps, the strength of these harmonics is sufficient to mislead you about where the 'true' difference frequency really sits.
Alternatively, is there some other source of signal which is being unintentionally mixed, and producing (probably from its harmonics - and if the unintended signal has a square shape, these will mainly be odd - as will your oscillator harmoncs if they are clipped, giving a whole series of "null" points) these "multiple pitch field shadows heard as background birdies".
So, these are the 'conventional' type of explanations I can think of - other "conventional" explanations would include measurement error - you show a "carrier" at 30kHz, which is what I really have a problem with - where is this "carrier" coming from if the oscillators are running at about 850kHz? - Is this "carrier" the result of one oscillator running at (say) 850k, and the other running at 880kHz? ... If this is the case, and your soundcard is sampling at 96kHz, then all hell will break loose and you cannot believe anything you see or hear!
But all the above probably comes over as disparaging, and this is not my intent - I am just stating the obvious, which I feel sure you must have looked at.. I just have a real problem understanding what you are saying on this page! I show some of the things I dont understand (and this may well be because my brain aint functioning as well as it once did, LOL):
>> "There is no Null Point, going below the lowest frequency 1 hz the field just reverses and the pitch rises, this can be seen at the beginning of the 5.5 meg wav sample above spread out in Audacity. Amplitude is unchanged throughout the range."
Where is this 5.5M, and how do you view 5.5M on a 96k sampling scope?
How are you resolving the frequency down to 1Hz? I cannot do that with a pile of sophisticated equipment (including HP analogue frequency descriminator).
The main problem for me is what you mean by "carrier" - is this actually a "carrier" formed from the difference frequency, and are you looking "inside" this carrier for other signals?
You show a clean 263.1Hz triangle wave, and you say " The sound card inputs the 30 kHz carrier frequency and may be giving a misrepresentation of the wave shape, but I don't think so. This can sound like a breathy flute, the wave shape indicates odd harmonics!"
Are you REALLY feeding 30kHz into your your sound card???
EDIT >>
One obscure, “off the wall” idea I have just had (and this does not eliminate my other questions) is this:
What if, your difference (carrier) frequency is 30kHz, and the oscillators are distorted producing lots of HF harmonics (or, probably more likely, there is some other interfering signal) and your hand is acting to attenuate these harmonics – as in, your hands capacitance is acting as a variable low pass filter..
This may cause you to see ‘linear’ frequency change on these ‘embedded’ waveforms – what you should (?) see is “steps” in the frequency of the ‘embedded’ waveforms as higher harmonics are attenuated and the lower harmonics become predominant.
Look – there are lots of flaws in the above hypothesis – and lots of possible complications due to how you are viewing the waveforms and the (probably likely) misleading “information” being displayed.. but I float this idea anyway.
Fred.
Ps - If we get into further discussion about this, perhaps we should move such discussion to some relevant topic.. But, unless there is new information, I dont really think I can contribute any more (anything) on this subject, much as I would love to - I like to think of myself as an open-minded person + engineer, but I am probably not that open-minded in reality, LOL! ... I think sometimes one can get too open-minded and all ones brains fall out! ;-) I am, as you know, absolutely convinced that capacitance is the primary principle on which theremins operate, and that there must be some capacitive mechanism by which the Lev antenna works - This kind of thinking (whether wrong or right) does influence the way I view what you raised on your web page.. You are (it seems to me) seeking exotica and 'wierdness' and have a much more 'artistic' way of exploring circuits - I am always boiling things down to their core components and mostly working within the engineering disiplines which have solid basis in physics.. I DO accept that there are many unknowns in physics, and I will even accept that some of the fundamental laws are flawed, and for this reason I keep an open mind on anything that those who step outside into "pseudo science" come up with... But, in the main, I am not able to step into and explore "pseudo science" - I am not equipped to do so - perhaps I limit myself because of this, but I cannot spend time looking for a complex reason for some event, if a perfectly satisfactory simple reason exists.. Occams razor - But Occams razor has been called "Occams lack of imagination" by some!