The “Box” was one of several early instruments guilty of sacrilege with robotic movement to mimic a theremin. People began to identify these sounds as a theremin and so onward went the downward spiral, losing the essence of the classic theremin. This topic of Clara’s “sound” is interesting as I have brought it up in the past. People immediately begin defending Clara’s “voice” which is something I seem to view entirely different, she transforms the classic sound, which must come first, to be her signature voice. My own research “demonstrates” to me the best classic theremin sound is developed through the vacuum tube and nowhere else, as of today. This type of research is a lost art although “very” available.
Many have heard this… Meet the authentic “vacuum tube” sound in my Altermen.
Listen.mp3 460k
Though I can't play a tune this is like nature singing from an instrument that is somewhere between a more fluid fingerboard and a classic theremin. It's cable direct to a sound card, no post processing or nasty reverb! No acoustics, transformers, and no mixer tricks, just your computer speakers generating it, but where does the mysterious sound come from? It is an event that develops through the vacuum tube.
So much is involved in reaching this level of design I am beginning to understand why the digital folks want to replicate the theremin, in all its aspects of physics around a Chip, will it be another toy or will they capture the essence? I wish they could. It would be nice to throw it over your shoulder and gig?
The theremin sound should not be lacking in richness, needing reverb to give it life! If we allow the classic “voice” to fade from consciences we will have lost touch with a force in nature and one major fundamental of the original theremin, evolving backward into the early attitude of “hunched over man” hovering over a primitive keyboard.
Edit: I remember reading somewhere that after an engineer repaired Clara Rockmore's theremin she mentioned it no longer had the classic sound she was familiar. )-: