"Hello Opto, Let me help you with your link. Theremini from B&H"
Thanks for that. Fixed it.
"I always thought this instrument would ruin any potential future Thereminist, it lacks the classic magic when a keyboard can give better results for that type of sound. Christopher"
Hence the Stereolab comment in another post. Is it a "Theremin"? Nope. It's not even called a Theremin, "The Theremini is a reimagining..." (why is cutting and pasting text from another site such a cludge here???).
Before I knew anything about synthesizers I bought what I thought was my first synth, a Moog Opus 3. I was 17 years old. The Opus was considered a joke by just about anyone who knew anything about synthesizers. I didn't know anything about synthesizers and the Opus was a bad purchase as a result but I never made a similar and costly mistake again. The mistake was not understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the Opus, not that the Opus was a bad instrument to own for someone who knew that they wanted an Opus for it's strengths. In an age when CS80s, Memorymoogs, and Arp Odysseys still roamed the earth there weren't, however, many who fell into the latter category.
Fast forward...
About twenty years later the Opus became desirable because Stereolab had found a use for it and made it work within the context of their music. I ended up giving my Opus away to a a friend who was big Stereolab fan and wanted it for what it could do even though it wasn't really much of a synthesizer. I never warmed up to the Opus, never like the sounds I got out of it, and I understand why so many disliked it back in the day, but somewhere along the way it developed quite a following. They haven't changed my feelings about it though, going on 35 years.
Soon enough (or maybe years from now after most of them have long been binned) some quirky band is going to put a Theremini to good use. The used prices will skyrocket and nobody will remember how vilified they were.