Pitch Preview: I agree with Gordon’s 3. Especially number 1. I never could explain why I thought of it as cheating, but these are reasons well explained. Another thing is that when I listen to performers who do not use a pitch preview, their music is much more rich, much warmer and moves me so much more than someone who does use pitch preview. The performer who uses pitch preview sounds very dry, very calculated, absent of feeling almost generic.
However, there were a few of you who said that in a recording situation it would be useful to use and although I never thought about it, I suppose it would be useful. But again if you are just using it in a recording session to find ONLY your first note, for the sake of money and time, this may be fine. Then again you can find your first note in a recording session BEFORE the engineer starts to record (the engineer can also cut it out later from the mix), or he can record your first note on a different track and feed it out to your headphone mix so you will be prepared to play when you are to come in. I think even the latter has still less of a cheat feel then using the preview. Having someone play your first note for you is a good thing but over time, if you have practiced enough, you should already know what your first note is (what it sounds like) and, because of the practice and developing muscle and spatial memory, you will know where your beginning position is supposed to be, then all you have to do is listen quietly to yourself and find the true pitch. Really, for me, always tuning my “low G” before I play, no matter what position I am standing in, has helped incredibly.
When I think of pitch preview I think of a band who on a CD sound really good but in person sound bad- you realize then that the only reason why they sound good is because the engineer used all kinds of effects, and made them sound decent. We do it all the time when we record. It’s almost always the singers that need the heavy processing. It’s usually just because they have no training or are not at a level where they are ready to be recording anyway, instead they should be practicing and training. Then again, the experience of “fixing” as students is good for us. Anyway, so that’s kinda how I think of it.
There is so much ear training software out there and so much of it now is totally free online. Then again, I wonder if it’s because technology has advanced and we don’t have to struggle so much, like other’s before us OR if it’s because we are a people of instant gratification and if we can get it now then why wait?! Pitch preview is very much like discussing analog tape vs. digital recording. It’s just a preference and no one is really right or wrong, but everyone feels that they are right.
I will not be using pitch preview anytime soon. If I get to a point in my training where I have really tried to practice, ear train and have done all I can and I can’t get the pitches because of some real physical limitation (who knows maybe I have a deformed ear drum or something) and I really can’t do it on my own then yeah I guess I will try the visual preview- I still don’t like the one that goes in your ear, it seems intrusive + if my ears are messed up then I guess I could not use the ear one anyway).
Fingering: I think ultimately, the piece of music you will play will really determine the way you will want to use your hands/fingers/wrists, etc. Plus comfort is still very important. Alexander said, “Concentration and intuition may be far more important than technique, though. Learning to listen to yourself and fundamentally TRUST yourself is the key to playing well.” Charles tells me almost the exact same thing when I play. When I relax and follow this advice is when I get to a place where I am the music and I am making that connection with my Theremin, it is almost a dream state and because of those reasons my playing is a million times better- I can FEEL it become me, every part of m