> You may find that lowering this frequency (increase L) to about 200kHz will improve linearity and extend the sensing field
Just a guess, but lowering the nominal pitch oscillator frequencies should reduce the pitch sensitivity somewhat. This could lead to the greater linearity you describe since you're moving over a smaller frequency range where the inherently nonlinear frequency-reactance relationship for capacitors is less noticeable. The early versions of my pitch oscillators ran around 700 kHz, but I found them a bit too sensitive and backed off the frequency to 500 kHz.
As to extending the sense distance, I have no idea there. I would assume that the geometry of the antenna and its placement would have the greatest effect on the sense distance since the interaction method is capacitive. Reducing the coupling between the pitch oscillators might also help as doing so lowers their ability to lock on to one another at the very close frequencies implied by greater hand distance. Then again, I haven't done much investigation into optimizing the sense distance, so my assumptions could be off.
If memory serves, I observed a bit longer-range sense distance in the prototype, which had the antenna set on a wood stand relatively far away from any ground planes. In my mind this gives some credence to the dependence of sense distance on antenna geometry/placement. Originally I had wanted to use a slightly larger enclosure than this one; you can see how tightly everything is packed and imagine how carefully it had to be laid out and built. However, we needed to build something fairly quickly and found a box previously used for another purpose. If I did it again I think I'd try to move the antennas farther away from the active circuitry and any strong grounds.
That's not to say it's unplayable in its current form. I can stumble through some simple motifs, limited more by my own lack of playing ability than the instrument (this is the first Theremin I've actually used). I think there's certainly room for improvement, but using aerial fingering I can pretty easily play some scales without feeling too crampt. Of course, you should take my word with a grain of salt since I have played no other Theremins to compare against...
> I especially love the RCA tube right up front. It's like a nod to the original RCA theremins of yesteryear. Fantastic!!
The 6AL5 twin diode (the tiny tube in the back on the left) is also an RCA tube, and I believe the 12AX7 may be a late-40s or early-50s RCA as well from its construction. The 12AU7s (ECC82s) are all new tubes made by JJ/Tesla. We have several drawers full of tubes here which probably haven't been touched since the 1960s (the cabinets are at least that old). I only wish I could've found a use for the very cool-looking 6AW8A triode/pentode tube I found which had half-exposed grids in the pentode section.
Thanks for the kind remarks, everyone.
Just a guess, but lowering the nominal pitch oscillator frequencies should reduce the pitch sensitivity somewhat. This could lead to the greater linearity you describe since you're moving over a smaller frequency range where the inherently nonlinear frequency-reactance relationship for capacitors is less noticeable. The early versions of my pitch oscillators ran around 700 kHz, but I found them a bit too sensitive and backed off the frequency to 500 kHz.
As to extending the sense distance, I have no idea there. I would assume that the geometry of the antenna and its placement would have the greatest effect on the sense distance since the interaction method is capacitive. Reducing the coupling between the pitch oscillators might also help as doing so lowers their ability to lock on to one another at the very close frequencies implied by greater hand distance. Then again, I haven't done much investigation into optimizing the sense distance, so my assumptions could be off.
If memory serves, I observed a bit longer-range sense distance in the prototype, which had the antenna set on a wood stand relatively far away from any ground planes. In my mind this gives some credence to the dependence of sense distance on antenna geometry/placement. Originally I had wanted to use a slightly larger enclosure than this one; you can see how tightly everything is packed and imagine how carefully it had to be laid out and built. However, we needed to build something fairly quickly and found a box previously used for another purpose. If I did it again I think I'd try to move the antennas farther away from the active circuitry and any strong grounds.
That's not to say it's unplayable in its current form. I can stumble through some simple motifs, limited more by my own lack of playing ability than the instrument (this is the first Theremin I've actually used). I think there's certainly room for improvement, but using aerial fingering I can pretty easily play some scales without feeling too crampt. Of course, you should take my word with a grain of salt since I have played no other Theremins to compare against...
> I especially love the RCA tube right up front. It's like a nod to the original RCA theremins of yesteryear. Fantastic!!
The 6AL5 twin diode (the tiny tube in the back on the left) is also an RCA tube, and I believe the 12AX7 may be a late-40s or early-50s RCA as well from its construction. The 12AU7s (ECC82s) are all new tubes made by JJ/Tesla. We have several drawers full of tubes here which probably haven't been touched since the 1960s (the cabinets are at least that old). I only wish I could've found a use for the very cool-looking 6AW8A triode/pentode tube I found which had half-exposed grids in the pentode section.
Thanks for the kind remarks, everyone.