Oh, POOP!
Does this mean the donnybrook is over? And just when I ordered another beer!
In regard to what IS and what IS NOT a theremin, I think most people probably subscribe to the notion that it's a theremin if you say it's a theremin. A few weeks ago, I posted a comment to the following "theremin" video, pointing out that the instrument we hear is not a theremin.
Tomboyish Girl (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSgDtfcwAdg)
The person who posted the video replied, saying, "... whether it's a VST [Virtual Studio Technology] or the real thing, I'll still call it a theremin for sure".
So here we have someone whose definition of a theremin is anything that sounds theremin-like, regardless of whether it is gestural or played on a keyboard synthesizer. "Theremin" seems to apply to a particular sound or effect rather than the method by which that sound is produced. I have frequently seen the entirely acoustic instrument known as the "Waterphone" referred to as a type of theremin because it makes an eerie, vaguely spooky, theremin sort of tone.
As a thereminist, I could tell within a just a couple of seconds that the instrument on the above video was not a theremin. There was no need to prove that it wasn't a theremin or to offer documentation (which is what the individual who posted the video requested). Once you are familiar with the Mona Lisa you are not going to be fooled by a second rate copy, and you are probably not going to waste your time trying to prove to someone who doesn't know any better that it is not an original Da Vinci.
I've never played a MIDI Wave theremin, so I can't say anything about it except to point out that it does not fit the definition of a theremin as I understand it. When you go to the MIDI Wave website, the very first thing you see is the following comment: "We offer a Midi Theremin alternative that is far superior to the Moog Ethervox Theremin or any other so called Midi Theremin".
I have heard these kinds of claims many times, and I think the people who make them are quite sincere. They really believe what they are saying. The problem is not that they are deliberately lying, the problem is they don't know what they're talking about. I would wonder how much time the person who made the above claim has actually spent with the Ethervox theremin. He does not tell us WHY his instrument is "far superior" to the Ethervox, he only tells us that it IS.
It may be a reference to the multiple FX that are built into the unit (tremolo, "stereo", auto tune, etc.). One thing it does not have is a MIDI IN function (the Moog Ethervox has this). The MIDI Wave is not just pitch only, it is MIDI OUT only as well. The Ethervox will play back (via its MIDI IN port) a MIDI track you have recorded to a sequencer using the MIDI OUT port. As for the MIDI Wave's built in FX, they can easily be added to any theremin by using peripherals.
Bob Moog made fewer than 50 Ethervox MIDI theremins. It came out in early 1998 and cost $3500.00. One of the very first units went to the Japanese composer known as "Kitaro" (I got serial # 007). I have many theremins and have played, at one time or another, just about every make of theremin ever manufactured. In my opinion, the Ethervox (which is actually three instruments in a single cabinet - something the MIDI Wave claims to be as well) is the finest theremin ever made. There is one currently listed on ebay with a Buy Now price of $5,995.00.
I have never played a pitch-only instrument (Gakken Mini, Matryomin, Zep, Dollhead, Theremaniac analog, etc.) and for me, as a precision thereminist, they are not theremins. They're toys. Some of them are even made out of toys. Still, they are widely appreciated by large numbers of people for whom these kinds of devices represent everything they ever wanted in a musical instrument.
As for the MIDI theremin concept, the problem has always been that MIDI receivers