"Now can we agree to disagree" - Christopher
LOL! ;-) - "agree to disagree" always strikes me as a funny statement - if parties disagree, they have no civilised option but to "agree to disagree" We disagree, and thats fine - it makes life more interesting! ;-)
We are all human (I think) and IMO our individual "foibles" often obscure what we are trying to communicate - some of these "foibles" often relate to ideas we hold passionately, and in our efforts to communicate these ideas our irrational defences can make us look silly..
IMO, you were "silly" to attempt to defend your " The theremins basic response occurs from the distance of the closest grounding mass to any part of the pitch antenna. " - As this statement was clearly wrong (if your hand is 30cm from the antenna, and someone walks up and stands 40cm from the antenna, the theremins pitch will change!) - I believe that the reason you irrationally defended the statement was the (probably erronious) idea that somehow accepting this statement as error meant relinquishing your hypothesis.
If there was another (less specific) mechanism I could use to explain the pitch / area / distance relationship, I would be happy to do so - Capacitance is not something well understood by those not "into" physics or electronics - a simple alternative descriptive way to explain things would be most welcome - but I have no idea of such a mechanism, so I cannot escape "conflict" with you, becausev I must use capacitance to explain things - even if this were to turn out to just be a useful analogy.
Neither of us will ever be "proven" to be "right" - Science does not allow that! - When it comes down to it, there may be no such thing as an "actual" theremin - they may just exist as figments of our (twisted ;-) imaginations, and we may well exist in different "universes" of our seperate minds.... But I think I am going a bit off topic.... LOL!
Fred.