"Ok FredM, or whomever else is qualified, the floor is yours. " - Thomas
LOL ;-) once again I jump in as "qualified" LOL ... But in this case I might just be a bit more "qualified" than most, even if my knowledge of the subject is far less than most subjects where I have no "qualification" .. (I am a certified Cypress consultant - I underwent the most rigourous exam [back in 2005] I have ever been subjected to in order to get certified - Capacitive sensing was one major "topic" - But I really dont have a clue about the later more sophisticated CapSense and its use in things like notepads - the studies I undertook may well be what led me to theremins - and to making the huge mistakes I did - But most capacitance sensing I have really worked on has not used Cypress CapSense)
It is a little strange to me that the effect is so dramatic - I have used PSoC (Cypress) CapSense with theremins without problem (in fact, I have been looking at implementing CapSense for the controls of my latest theremin)..
I suspect that perhaps the Synaptics (a competitor to Cypress, and I have no inside knowledge of their hardware or software) capacitance sensing used in the Samsung Chromebook is working to a much higher resolution than what I have been playing with - I have played with simple capacitive "buttons" and "sliders" and use a lot of digital filtering - each sensor effectively only requires an "off" state and an "on" state, and the thresholds are quite wide apart, and dynamic calibration looks for noise and adjusts the thresholds to compensate for backgound stuff.. Only quick changes (like turning a theremin on) can upset it momentarily..
But with touch screens where one is looking for "analogue" data on multiple dimensions over a small surface, and require fast recognition of gestural actions, I suspect that the sensitivity to signals which could be "seen as" capacitive influences, will be FAR higher.. One does not have the luxury of wide (or any) "thresholds" -
And I suspect that if a clean signal is not obtainable from the capacitive sensors, the software will disable the sensors - Better to have no capacitance sensing than to have the pointer randomly selecting objects and activating them or doing other nasties.
Nonetheless, the severity of the problem does surprise me.. As for a "fix" this will depend on the causitive mechanism / path.
If the player is well grounded, then I imagine capacitive coupling from the theremin to the notepad is likely to be via direct coupling.. So it may be worth playing with putting the notepad into a grounded enclosure which obscures the pad from the theremin on a line-of-sight path.. Something like a grounded aluminium book-end between the theremin and the notepad might be enough.
Otherwise you might just need to wait for me or someone else to produce shielded directional antenna theremins.. This tale makes me quite pleased that I opted for directional antennas which supress all radiation except for the focus field.. One of the main motivations for this was the notion that one wants to keep signals confined to the playing area so that they dont upset other theremins or other electronic equipment.. And this technology also shields the theremin from reception of interference from all sources not in the playing focus field.
But waiting for me - well - it might be a long wait.. Kind of sad really, because I now have all the technology independently tested, quite a lot has been put together in trial systems - but its still only a load of prototype boards and prototype antennas and gigs of design files and simulations.. All there - But all an expensive and difficult distance from production.
Fred.
Oh, I dont know much about WiFi - But it would REALLY surprise me if this was in any way related to the problem.