If only they made a 50Hz hummer for us Brits.
With regards to the Boss PS2, I'm waiting for some inspiration before using it in anger. To my way of thinking it transforms the theremin from a lead instrument into an accompanying instrument, so I'm hopeful it will find a use at the sonic weekender - particularly as a number of the participants seem to have a lo-fi ethic going on - or as part of a multi-tracked piece.
I have also been drooling a bit over the current version, the PS5, now that I understand pitch shifting better. It has some interesting options - in particular it will generate harmonics in major and minor keys so I could mix Harry Partch style wandering melodies with Western style harmonies, and it offers expression-pedal control over the spread of the harmonics generated, so I could vary from a very thin tone with sub-harmonics in the low cents right out to a fat two octave spread during the course of a performance.
But, at £150 it's a bit out of my price range, and I'd rather be saving up for my Nord G2 if I had the cash to spare.
What delights me most about my PS2 is more theoretical than practical. Most of all it stands as a "proof of concept" and having one in my hands to play with has confirmed some of my ideas and allowed me to refine them somewhat and state them more clearly.
So here goes...
The three things that a theremin player has direct control over are pitch, volume and timing. The major limitation of the theremin is that it is monophonic, with no easy way to achieve keyboard style polyphony where more than one note can be controlled independently. However we can derive new voices from the original voice by varying the pitch, volume and timing in a predetermined manner.
For instance a delay pedal generates secondary voices that have the same pitch as the original voice but are varied in time and volume according to the setting of the knobs on the device.
Likewise a pitch shift pedal generates secondary voices that are time invariant and related to the primary voice by pitch and volume.
Both delays and pitch shifts work well, but are to some extent limited by using feedback loops to generate tertiary and subsequent voices. Some of these limitations can be overcome by using multiple effects pedals, for instance chaining two delays together operating at different speeds, or chaining a second delay into one channel of a ping-pong delay, and then combining both channels.
Partch noted (as mentioned previously in this thread) that pitch and time can also be related to one another. One expression of this notion is the Rhythmicon, which correlates pitch and rhythm. (Also by Leon Termen, in co-operation with composer Henry Cowell, and with a slightly different take on the notion to Partch.)
My idea is to have several slaved tone generators that generate tones that can be related to the primary melody by any combination of pitch, volume and time, with options to link the slave units together in a variety of combinations, including feedback loops.
One development of this idea would be to generate further related tones by combining the output of two slave units by means of a ring modulator. Given the theremins apparent affinity for ring modulation - who am I to contradict The Man From Uranus? (AKA Phil. I don't know his last name, and "Phil Uranus" sounds a little weird) - I am optimistic that this will be a worthwhile area to investigate when opportunity presents itself.
Still to be figured out is the best way of controlling the function of slave units during a performance. Clearly foot pedals are the option of choice, but exactly what they should control is unresolved at this time. I am pretty certain that I want foot controls for major functions, but the numerous little knobs and patches should also be accessible for fiddling with, preferably without having to do it on my hands and knees like Pamelia.