Hi Dewster,
My plan was to do comprehensive testing and documentation - but I got side-tracked (as usual).. This is still on my "to do" list.
I was heavily into the Lev oscillator some months back - trying to find an off-the-shelf transformer to replace the air wound tank transformer.. I had used CMC's in the past for antenna inductors and these had seemed to work well, so I first went this route for the Lev tank transformer - and I had apalling results.. So I set about winding my own transformers / coils, and using a peltier fridge / warmer to see the effects.
I started doing detailed logging of results - but it just takes too much time - I wanted to get the Lev clone running, so hurried through the process.. when it was obvious that the Lev oscillator was not going to do what I wanted it to do, I moved to other things.
As I say, Comprehensive evaluation is still on my to-do list.. But its importance to me had dropped a bit because I am actively correcting the resulting errors presenting at the output CV - I do however still want a comprehensive set of test results - this is indformation that will be gold dust.
But will need to wait until I have moved - My biggest problem right now is having a tiny work area and having to pack everything away in order to make space to do anything else...
All I can say at this time is that there was a minor improvement when using air coils rather than the 6300 series inductors, a minor but more significant improvement when using an air wound equivalent of the 42IF106 IF transformer vs the Ferrite slug IFT, and an absolutely massive improvement using an air wound transformer for the Lev oscillator rather than a off-the-shelf CMC, and air wound also beat other broad-band Coilcraft ferrite transformers I was trying for the Lev oscillator, and beat my hand wound (on a 42IF106 former) transformer, although this was the best of the ferrites.
If things go to plan, I will be moving from my home within a few months and into a vacant 3 bedroom house - I will be able to set up my ATE and fridge, and run full automated test - and I will publish what I find! - I think that what is really needed is a table of inductance vs temperature - or perhaps SRF vs temperature ? I was just looking at the oscillator frequency vs temperature - but what do you think the best measure would be?
"I imagine thermal variation of an air core is most likely due to the expansion / contraction of the copper wire, which the coil former might help minimize. Hence the use of ceramic formers with the wire tightly wound in ham VFOs.." - Dewster
I think you are right, but there was no sophistication with my air coils - the best were wound on Tufnol (epoxy paper) tube, some were wound on ABS pipe. I use enameled silver plated copper wire of 0.1mm or 0.2mm diameter depending on expected current, and "tight" or "tidy" is not how I would describe them (they are not works of art like the coils Charlie winds!) .. but I do fix the windings rigidly with hard adhesive / varnish.
All I can say is that air coils beat ferrites WRT thermal stability - or at least this is what my limited tests lead me to believe.. I do not know how various air coils or the construction of these will compare against each other - but I do suspect that a coil wound by Lev or by CHobbs will outperform any coil I could ever wind!
Winding coils is not something I enjoy at all - I have built several winding jigs, but think I should have just gone out and bought a winder when I could afford to - I have probably spent as much on my home-brew winders by now. My aim is always to just wind one working coil that I can take to a local contractor (or send to China) who can manufacture them.
Oh - buying copper wire from electronics suppliers can be a pain - big spools costing a fortune which are difficult to handle.. I found a UK supplier who sells small reels of really good ECW in lots of really pretty colours (great when winding transformers etc)
http://wires.co.uk/acatalog/colour_copper.html
Fred.